Shahbandar of Acheh

Properties2
tagsperson, achehnese, concept, malay, atjeh, port, trade, precolonial, colonial, 16th-century, 17th-century, office, atjehnese, acehnese, colonial-administration, administrative, sultanate
aliasesSjahbandar, Shahbandar, Sabander, Sabandar, Shahbandar (port official), Sabander of Atjeh, Sabander of Pedir, Sabandaar, Syahbandar, Sabandaar (harbor-master), havenmeester van Atjeh, Sjabandar, Harbor Master of Atjeh, harbour master, shah-bandar

8 min read

The Shahbandar of Acheh (also written Sjahbandar) was the harbour master of Acheh — the chief port official of the Achehnese capital, and the customary channel of communication between foreign merchants and the Achehnese chiefs. In the confused politics of the Acheh succession dispute he played a double role: as the official intermediary of the Three Sagis he was the person to whom the Raffles–Coombs Commission of 1819 was told to address itself, and he was also the assassin of Tunku Pakih, the powerful chief of Pedir and protector of Sultan Jauhar Alum.

The Commission’s intermediary (March 1819)

When, on 14 March 1819, the joint Commission of Raffles and Coombs anchored before the Achehnese capital, no sultan was present. The Commission sent a circular to the chiefs summoning them to an assembly. Panglima Polim replied from his XXII Mukims that the assembly would take place in eight days, but that until then the Commission was not to come ashore; “if it had anything to say, one would address oneself to the Shahbandar”. The Shahbandar thus appears in the British records as the standing official through whom the Achehnese chiefs chose to transact with foreigners; his role was that of the customary shahbandar of Malay port-polities, with the difference that, at Acheh, the central authority was so fragmented that the office had become an instrument of the Three Sagis rather than of a sultan.

The mission to Pedir and the murder of Tunku Pakih

The Shahbandar’s most consequential action belongs to the period immediately after the Commission had concluded its seven-week sojourn at Acheh and was preparing to sail for Pedir. The British government’s report of 7 October 1820 recorded that, before any negotiation could be opened with Jauhar Alum, an apology had to be received from him for past insults against the British flag — one of which, as recounted on page 161 of the article, was the capture of a British brig by Tunku Pakih in 1817–18. To carry this apology and to offer the submission of the three Sagis, the Shahbandar of Acheh proceeded to Pedir at the head of a commission.

The mission was a feint. As Van der Kemp narrates:

“The shahbandar of Acheh had proceeded with a commission to Pedir, as if to ask Sultan Djohor’s forgiveness and to offer him his submission on behalf of the three Sagis, but in truth with the aim of deceiving the prince. When he found himself hindered in this design by Packie, he stabbed him to death.”

The death of Tunku Pakih removed at a stroke the principal support of Jauhar Alum’s party at Pedir and the chief obstacle to the Shahbandar’s intrigue. Van der Kemp cautions that “the truth of this representation may perhaps be doubted; in any case Packie was no more”. The Asiatic Journal, which Van der Kemp cites, gives the same account. With Tunku Pakih’s removal, the path was smoothed for the treaty of 22 April 1819 between Raffles and Jauhar Alum.

Place in the wider narrative

The Shahbandar’s double role — official intermediary and factional assassin — captures the character of Achehnese politics in 1819: the formal port-officials of the sultanate had become instruments of the Three Sagis and of Panglima Polim, who together treated both rival sultans as mere tools. The Shahbandar’s mission to Pedir was one of the immediate preliminaries to the Acheh treaty of 1819, and his murder of Tunku Pakih one of the decisive local events that made the treaty possible.

Sources

Coen, Koopman van Heeren Zeventien. Geschiedenis van den Hollandshen Handel in Indië (1598-1614), by Johan van der Woude (Amsterdam: C.V. Uitgeverij v/h C. De Boer Jr., 1948), Hoofdstuk V “Voorgangers, Hollanders en mededingers tot 1614. Atjeh. Djohor. Malaka.” (pp. 111-114). Tijdens de O.I. Compagnie, by Dr. E. C. Godee Molsbergen, Oud-Hoogleeraar, Landsarchivaris te Batavia (Amsterdam: N.V. Swets & Zeitlinger Boekhandel en Uitgevers Mij., 1932), chapter XI (“Atjehsche ambassade. Inlandsche feesten. Maagden als losprijs”), pp. 39–43 of the numbered-letter sequence. De geschiedenis van Nederland in onzen tijd, by J. A. de Bruyne, Directeur der Hoogere Burgerschool te Zierikzee. Deel IV. 1872-1883. Nieuwe uitgave. Schiedam: J. F. Dupont, 1912, Hoofdstuk I, pp. 9-11, 104. Atjèh. Algemeen samenvattend overzicht van land en volk van Atjèh en onderhoorigheden, door J. Kreemer, Archivaris van het Atjèh Instituut. Tweede Deel. Leiden: N.V. Boekhandel en Drukkerij voorheen E.J. Brill, 1923. Identifier: Delpher MMKB02B:000001798; PPN 395084288. Koninklijke Bibliotheek.

See Also

Source

Raffles’ Atjeh-overeenkomst van 1819, by P. H. van der Kemp, in Bijdragen van het Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde van Nederlandsch-Indië, 6e Volgr., Deel VII (1900), pp. 159-239. Universiteitsbibliotheek Vrije Universiteit, LS.08781.

The Shahbandar of Acheh (also written Sjahbandar) was the harbour master of Acheh — the chief port official of the Achehnese capital, and the customary channel of communication between foreign merchants and the Achehnese chiefs. In the confused politics of the Acheh succession dispute he played a double role: as the official intermediary of the Three Sagis he was the person to whom the Raffles–Coombs Commission of 1819 was told to address itself, and he was also the assassin of Tunku Pakih, the powerful chief of Pedir and protector of Sultan Jauhar Alum.

The Commission’s intermediary (March 1819)

When, on 14 March 1819, the joint Commission of Raffles and Coombs anchored before the Achehnese capital, no sultan was present. The Commission sent a circular to the chiefs summoning them to an assembly. Panglima Polim replied from his XXII Mukims that the assembly would take place in eight days, but that until then the Commission was not to come ashore; “if it had anything to say, one would address oneself to the Shahbandar”. The Shahbandar thus appears in the British records as the standing official through whom the Achehnese chiefs chose to transact with foreigners; his role was that of the customary shahbandar of Malay port-polities, with the difference that, at Acheh, the central authority was so fragmented that the office had become an instrument of the Three Sagis rather than of a sultan.

The mission to Pedir and the murder of Tunku Pakih

The Shahbandar’s most consequential action belongs to the period immediately after the Commission had concluded its seven-week sojourn at Acheh and was preparing to sail for Pedir. The British government’s report of 7 October 1820 recorded that, before any negotiation could be opened with Jauhar Alum, an apology had to be received from him for past insults against the British flag — one of which, as recounted on page 161 of the article, was the capture of a British brig by Tunku Pakih in 1817–18. To carry this apology and to offer the submission of the three Sagis, the Shahbandar of Acheh proceeded to Pedir at the head of a commission.

The mission was a feint. As Van der Kemp narrates:

“The shahbandar of Acheh had proceeded with a commission to Pedir, as if to ask Sultan Djohor’s forgiveness and to offer him his submission on behalf of the three Sagis, but in truth with the aim of deceiving the prince. When he found himself hindered in this design by Packie, he stabbed him to death.”

The death of Tunku Pakih removed at a stroke the principal support of Jauhar Alum’s party at Pedir and the chief obstacle to the Shahbandar’s intrigue. Van der Kemp cautions that “the truth of this representation may perhaps be doubted; in any case Packie was no more”. The Asiatic Journal, which Van der Kemp cites, gives the same account. With Tunku Pakih’s removal, the path was smoothed for the treaty of 22 April 1819 between Raffles and Jauhar Alum.

Place in the wider narrative

The Shahbandar’s double role — official intermediary and factional assassin — captures the character of Achehnese politics in 1819: the formal port-officials of the sultanate had become instruments of the Three Sagis and of Panglima Polim, who together treated both rival sultans as mere tools. The Shahbandar’s mission to Pedir was one of the immediate preliminaries to the Acheh treaty of 1819, and his murder of Tunku Pakih one of the decisive local events that made the treaty possible.

See Also

Source

Raffles’ Atjeh-overeenkomst van 1819, by P. H. van der Kemp, in Bijdragen van het Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde van Nederlandsch-Indië, 6e Volgr., Deel VII (1900), pp. 159-239. Universiteitsbibliotheek Vrije Universiteit, LS.08781.

Graph View

Backlinks