Jan van Groenewegen was the Compagnie’s koopman (merchant) at Padang and head of the Compagnie’s trade on the West Coast of Sumatra who, in 1662, conducted the secret negotiations with the Menangkabau chiefs that produced the Painansch Contract of 6 July 1663. In Dr. F. W. Stapel’s Geschiedkundige Atlas van Nederland he is the architect of the defection of the Westkust from “the croone of Atchin” (de croone van Atchin) to the protection of the Compagnie.
The 1662 secret mission
The Compagnie’s commercial frustrations on the Westkust — the Atjehsche governors’ tolls on Menangkabau pepper, the 1656 blockade’s failure, the arrest of Van Voorst — had by 1662 produced a willingness in Batavia to consider an open defection of the Westkust chiefs from Atjeh. The occasion was the Menangkabau chiefs’ own complaint: “besides, the population also complained about the hard yoke of the Atjehers” (bovendien klaagde ook de bevolking over het harde juk der Atjehers).
The Hooge Regeering’s order to Van Groenewegen is recorded by Stapel directly: “From Batavia one now gave to the merchant Jan van Groenewegen, established at Padang, head of the Compagnie’s trade on the West Coast, the order to make use of that displeasure and, without letting the Atjehers notice anything, to draw the Menangkabauers ‘from the croone of Atchin to the protection of the Compagnie’” (Van Batavia gaf men nu den te Padang gevestigden koopman Jan van Groenewegen, hoofd van ‘s Compagnies handel aan de Westkust, opdracht, van die ontstemming gebruik te maken en, zonder de Atjehers iets te laten merken, de Menangkabauers ‘van de croone van Atchin tot de bescherming van de Compagnie te trecken’).
The original Dutch phrase van de croone van Atchin tot de bescherming van de Compagnie te trecken — “to draw [them] from the croone of Atchin to the protection of the Compagnie” — is one of the most quotable lines in Stapel’s book. It captures, in a single image, the entire policy of the 1660s: the Westkust was to be transferred from one sovereign to another.
The 1662 negotiations
“In the course of 1662 Van Groenewegen had with various radjas and chiefs discussions to that end, and concluded preliminary secret agreements, by which the Compagnie obtained the trade monopoly, but might not meddle in the internal affairs of the princes and chiefs” (In den loop van 1662 had Van Groenewegen met verschillende radja’s en hoofden besprekingen dienaangaande, en sloot voorloopig geheime overeenkomsten, waarbij de Compagnie het handelsmonopolie verkreeg, doch zich niet met de interne zaken der vorsten en hoofden zou mogen bemoeien). The双边承诺包括:如果发生 Atjeh 攻击,双方将互相支持。
The “might not meddle” clause is significant. The Compagnie was offering protection, not administration: the Westkust chiefs were to retain internal sovereignty while transferring external defence to the Compagnie. This is the same arrangement that would be formalised in the Painansch Contract of 6 July 1663.
The Atjehsche suspicion
The negotiations did not remain wholly secret. “Despite all secrecy the Atjehers got wind of it; they protested against discussions behind their back. In Atjeh itself the resident of the Compagnie established there noticed the displeasure; he was no longer admitted to the court” (Ondanks alle geheimhouding kregen de Atjehers er toch de lucht van; zij protesteerden tegen besprekingen buiten hen om. In Atjeh zelf bemerkte de daar gevestigde resident van de Compagnie de ontstemming; hij werd niet meer tot het hof toegelaten).
The Compagnie’s resident at Atjeh — the same official whose position the 1659 peace had just restored — was now politically isolated. The sultane’s displeasure was real, and Van Groenewegen’s secret diplomacy had cost the Compagnie its court access at Atjeh.
The journey to Batavia
The Menangkabau envoys travelled to Batavia with Van Groenewegen, where the Hooge Regeering sealed the Painansch Contract on 6 July 1663. “The stay of some Menangkabau envoys at Batavia could not remain hidden from the Atjehsche governors, and although Van Groenewegen after his return declared that the gentlemen had only travelled with him to see that city, the relationship with Atjeh became even more strained by it” (Het verblijf van eenige Menangkabausche gezanten te Batavia kon de Atjehsche gouverneurs niet verborgen blijven, en, hoewel Van Groenewegen na zijn terugkeer verklaarde, dat de heeren alleen met hem waren meegereisd om die stad eens te bekijken, werd de verhouding tot Atjeh er nog stroever door).
The Atjehsche governors’ disbelief at Van Groenewegen’s excuse — that the chiefs had simply wanted to see Batavia — is a small comedy in the middle of the high diplomacy. It also reveals the limits of the secrecy: the Atjehsche governors on the Westkust were well informed, and the Compagnie’s cover story was threadbare.
Significance
Van Groenewegen’s mission is the political turning point of the entire Westkust story. It is the moment at which the Compagnie moved from co-operation with Atjeh (the 1659 peace) to active subversion of Atjeh’s sovereignty (the Painansch Contract of 1663). The “croone of Atchin” phrase is the emblem of that transition.
Van Groenewegen is also the architect of the constitutional form that would define the Westkust for the next century: Compagnie protection in exchange for commercial monopoly, with internal sovereignty retained by the native rulers. The Painansch Contract system, the Padang Conference and the long series of Painansch-form treaties that would follow are all Van Groenewegen’s intellectual children.
See Also
- Painansch Contract
- Sultana of Atjeh (Taj ul-Alam)
- Treaty of Atjeh-VOC (5 October 1659)
- Blockade of Atjeh (1656)
- Arrest of Anthony van Voorst
- Anthony van Voorst
- Menangkabau
- Jacob Cau
- Padang
- Westkust van Sumatra
- Vereenigde Oost-Indische Compagnie
- 1662
- 1663
- 6 July
Source
De Koloniën, by Dr. F. W. Stapel, in Geschiedkundige Atlas van Nederland (‘s-Gravenhage: Martinus Nijhoff, 1931), kaart 19, blz. 15–16 (tekst bij blad 4: Atjeh en de Westkust van Sumatra in 1684).